SCIENCE AND SANITY - online book

An Introduction To Non-aristotelian Systems And General Semantics.

Home | About | Philosphy | Contact | Search

MATHEMATICS AND THE WORLD                 261
At present, of all branches of mathematics the theory of numbers is probably the most difficult, obscure., and seemingly with the fewest applications. With a new A definition of numbers in terms of relations, this theory may become a relational study of very high order, which, perhaps, will some day become the foundation for epistemology and the key for the solution of all the problems of science and life. In the fields of cosmology many, if not the majority, of the problems, by necessity, cannot be considered as directly experimental, and so the solution must be epistemological.
At present, in our speculations, we are carried away by words, disregarding the simple fact that speaking about the 'radius of the universe', for instance, has no meaning, as it cannot possibly be observed. Perhaps, some day, we shall discover that such conversations are the result of our old stumbling block, identification, which leads to our being carried away by the sounds of words applicable to terrestrial conditions but meaningless in the very small, as discovered lately in the newer quantum mechanics, and, in the very large, as applied to the cosmos. An important illustration of the retardation of scientific progress, blocked by the confusion of orders of abstractions, is shown in the fact that the newer quantum mechanics were slow in coming, and though astronomers probably know about it, yet they still fail to grasp that expressions such as the 'radius of the universe', the 'running down of the universe'., are meaningless outside of psychopathology.
In this connection, we should notice an extremely interesting and important semantic characteristic; namely, that the term 'relation' is not only multiordinal but also non-el, as it applies to 'senses' and 'mind'. Relations are usually found empirically; so in a language of relations we have a language of similar structure to the world and a unique means for predictability and rationality.
Let me again emphasize that, from time immemorial, things have not been words; the only content of knowledge has been structural; mathematics has dealt, in the main, with numbers; no matter whether we have understood the character of numbers or not, numbers have expressed relations and so have given us structural data willy-nilly,. This explains why mathematics and numbers have, since time immemorial, been a favorite field, not only for speculations, but also why, in history, we find so many religious semantic disturbances connected with numbers. Mankind has somehow felt instinctively that in numbers we have a potentially endless array of unique and specific exact relations, which ultimately give us structure, the last being the only possible content of knowledge, because words are not things.