SCIENCE AND SANITY - online book

An Introduction To Non-aristotelian Systems And General Semantics.

Home | About | Philosphy | Contact | Search

290                V. MATHEMATICS A A LANGUAGE
that, with rats, the cortex is not essential for these learning processes. They 'learn' as well, or nearly as well, with their sub-cortical and thalamic regions.7 In what follows, to avoid misstatements, I will use the rather vague term, yet sufficient for my purpose, 'thalamic region' or 'lower centres' instead of more specific terms, the use of which would complicate the exposition unnecessarily. With dogs, apes, and men, the situation is increasingly different. Their nervous systems are more differentiated. Their functional interchangeability is impaired. In the most complex human brain there still exists some interchangeability of function. When an arm, for instance, is paralysed through a brain-lesion, the arm may re-acquire a nearly normal function, though there is no regeneration of the destroyed brain tissue. However, the interchangeability is less pronounced than in the lower brains. There seems to be no doubt that the thalamic regions are not only a vestibule through which all impulses from the receptors have to pass in order to reach the cortex, but also that the affective characteristics are strictly connected with processes in these regions. It seems that some very primitive and simple associa-s tions can be carried on by the thalamic regions.
The cortex receives its material as elaborated by the thalamus. The abstractions of the cortex are abstractions from abstractions and so ought to be called abstractions of higher order. In neurology, similarly, the neurons first excited are called of 'first order'; and the succeeding members of the series are called neurons of the 'second order',. Such terminology is structurally similar to the inherent structure and function of the nervous system. The receptors are in direct contact with the outside world and convey their excitation and nerve currents to the lower nerve centres, where these impulses are further elaborated and then abstracted by the higher centres.
According to our daily experience and scientific knowledge, the outside world is an ever-changing chain of events, a kind of flux; and, naturally, those nerve centres in closest contact with the outside world must react in a shifting way. These reactions are easily moved one way or another, as in our 'emotions', 'affective moods', 'attention', 'concentration', 'evaluation', and other such semantic responses. In these processes, some associative or relational circuits exist, and there may be some very low kind of 'thinking' on this level. Birds have a well-developed, or, perhaps, over-developed, thalamus but under-developed and poor cortex, which may be connected with their stupidity and excitability.
Something similar could be said about the 'thalamic thinking' in humans; those individuals who overwork their thalamus and use their cortex too little are 'emotional' and stupid. This statement is not exag-