SCIENCE AND SANITY - online book

An Introduction To Non-aristotelian Systems And General Semantics.

Home | About | Philosphy | Contact | Search

upon the theories of physics. Dealing with geodetics is therefore preferable to dealing with 'straight lines'.7
We see that the problem was ripe for a final stroke of genius. Einstein's structural discovery of the dependence of 'space' and 'time', and Minkowski's success in giving a geometrical interpretation to the Einstein theory accomplished the probably irreversible fusion.
Three-dimensional kinematics becomes four-dimensional geometry, three-dimensional dynamics can be considered as four-dimensional statics.
We see immediately the human, psycho-logical, semantic and neurological importance of this fact. Our nervous system by its structure produces abstractions of different orders, dynamic on some levels, static on others. The problems of sanity and adjustment become problems of translation from one level to another, for which the structural advances in science supply us with methods of solution.
It should be noticed that the semantic gain due to the above facts is considerable, and that being structural, it is practical as well as theoretical. The fact that geometry has lost its old restricted status, which formerly applied principally to what could be 'intuitively visualized' and has been further abstracted to apply to what can be 'conceived', has merged geometry with the rest of mathematics. This merging represents a great structural and semantic step forward, and makes possible the treatment of geometrical problems by purely analytical means. It liberates geometry from the restrictions of lower order abstractions. By using 'geometrical intuition' (lower order abstractions) we find again a great help in analysis.
In the cyclic nerve currents, our so-called 'intuitions' (lower order abstractions) are not structurally isolated from our 'conceptions' (higher order abstractions), but both are intimately connected and influence each other. Modern advances are not only in perfect accord with the 'organism-as-a-whole' principle, but indeed give us excellent proofs that this principle is sound. 'Psychologists' miss a great deal by disregarding this important and unique form of human behaviour which we call mathematizing.